THE WORK
Every filing, briefing, and submission — in one place.
Ordered by when the underlying research began, not just when it was filed. Each topic starts with the accessible article, followed by the formal legal briefing or submission behind it. Everything here is available in full on request.
Flagship research report · 29 pages · Research began Feb 2026
The Enforcement Gap
Online Islamophobia and the failure of digital governance in Europe, 2020–2025. A full-length report tracing the enforcement gap across platform behaviour, EU regulatory response, and civil-society capacity — with thirteen chapters, cross-country comparison, and a graded evidence-quality assessment.
Research began 21 Jan 2026 · Article · Medium · Published July 2026
When the Law Exists but Cannot Be Reached
Muslim communities and the rights gap in Europe: why a rights framework only six percent of affected people ever use is not functioning — and the four-pillar response EqualFaith Europe proposes to close that gap.
Research began 21 Jan 2026 · Published June 2026
Anti-Muslim Discrimination in Europe
A documented record of discrimination data, state measures, and platform amplification across the EU from 2024–2026, with an honest assessment of where legal pathways for redress are strong and where they are not.
Research began Jan 2026 · Legal analysis
The Fine That Missed the Point
Why X's €120 million DSA fine addressed advertising transparency — not the platform's undocumented systemic-risk failures around anti-Muslim amplification. Sets out the Article 34/35 case regulators have not yet brought.
Art. 34–35 DSA · Research began Jan 2026 · Filed 8 July 2026
Formal complaint against X Corp
Filed with the European Commission, arguing the platform has not properly assessed or mitigated foreseeable discrimination risk on its service, including the January 2025 and August 2024 amplification episodes.
Art. 40(12) DSA · 2026
Data access for discrimination research
A pending legal matter concerning researcher data access on major platforms, relevant to discrimination research. Details are withheld while the matter is active, to avoid prejudicing possible proceedings.
Research began May 2026
The Law That Punishes the Women It Claims to Protect
A decade of enforcement data across ten European countries on face-covering bans — who they actually fine, what evidence justified them, and what happened to the women living under them.
Submission · Portugal · Research began May 2026 · Filed 13 July 2026
On the pending face-covering ban
A formal submission to the Provedoria de Justiça on Portugal’s pending face-covering legislation, requesting constitutional scrutiny prior to or following promulgation.
Research began June 2026
The Blind Spot in Europe’s Child Safety Law
The public-facing companion to the minor-safety briefing below: why a platform can be fully compliant with EU child-safety rules while remaining structurally unable to see whether minority children are being targeted.
Art. 28 / 34(1)(b) DSA · Research began June 2026 · Published July 2026
Closing the Discrimination Blind Spot in EU Minor-Safety Regulation
The full policy and legal briefing underlying the Article 28(4) submission below: a 22-citation analysis of how the DSA’s minor-protection guidelines fail to capture discrimination-based harms, with a concrete institutional pathway to close the gap.
Art. 28(4) DSA · Research began June 2026 · Filed 10 July 2026
Formal submission: revision of the Minors Guidelines
Requests that the European Commission revise its July 2025 Guidelines on the Protection of Minors to require that platforms disaggregate minor-safety risk data by protected characteristic, closing a structural blind spot the Guidelines currently leave open.
Research began July 2026 · Companion article
The Algorithm Europe Forgot to Check
Europe just built the world’s most ambitious AI law. It forgot to point it at the machine deciding who gets hired — the accessible companion to The Employment Blind Spot.
AI Act Art. 27 · Research began July 2026 · Published July 2026
The Employment Blind Spot
The full research briefing behind the Article 27 submission below: how the AI Act exempts private-sector recruitment AI — the category most reliably documented to discriminate against religious minorities — from the Act’s only preventive fundamental-rights safeguard.
Art. 27 AI Act · Ref. EFE/AI-ACT/2026-01 · Research began July 2026 · Filed 28 July 2026
Closing the FRIA gap in recruitment AI
A formal submission to the European AI Office and AI Board proposing amendments so private-sector recruitment AI falls under mandatory Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, and introducing a GDPR-style right to compensation.
Research began July 2026 · Companion article
Trusted by Whom?
Europe built a fast lane for content flaggers. It forgot to ask who’s driving — the accessible companion to Who Flags the Flaggers?
Art. 22 DSA · Ref. EFE/DSA/2026-01 · Research began July 2026 · Published August 2026
Who Flags the Flaggers?
Closing the independence gap in the DSA’s trusted flagger mechanism: Article 22 secures independence from platforms, but not from governments, political movements, or funders. Proposes mandatory disclosure, independent review of contested designations, and proactive outreach to under-represented communities.